Research Reveals Bigger Picture Key to Understanding Grasslands

Michigan State University

Which factors do you consider when moving to a new area: school districts, home size or distance from work? If hundreds of people are competing for a spot, what determines who gets in?

Communities are ultimately shaped by an interplay of local factors, such as home size, and regional ones, such as school districts. New research appearing in the journal Ecology Letters asks how local and regional factors determine the makeup of plant species in grasslands.

Michigan State University researchers from the Brudvig Restoration Ecology lab are attempting to solve a longstanding question in community ecology: how do regional and local factors jointly determine biodiversity?

The authors argue that while both influence biodiversity, the effects of regional factors need to be better understood to help combat biodiversity loss.

Most prior research in the field has focused on how local factors — including competition for resources like soil nutrients or moisture — shape ecological communities.

This has resulted in a disproportionate understanding of how processes within communities shape biodiversity compared to those that span large regions and multiple communities. Such studies, the authors explain, have relied on observation alone – and have often been conducted under controlled conditions. "Such non-experimental approaches make it very challenging to draw cause-and-effect conclusions," Brudvig explained.

Helping to fill the gap, this research demonstrates that regional conditions alter the makeup of communities, providing a more nuanced picture of how biodiversity is determined.

To study this, the researchers seeded plots across 12 grassland sites with varying soil moisture levels with mixes of native grass seeds ranging from highly diverse (30 species) to minimally diverse (8 species). The quantity of seeds dispersed ranged from 270 to 970 seeds per square meter.

This allowed the researchers to parse out how the influx of species into communities influences their makeup over time, relative to the impact of soil moisture, which influences plant growth and competition between species at the local level.

How many species and individuals were introduced to the plots altered the makeup of species expected based on soil moisture alone. This revealed that local factors which drive inter-species competition can only partially explain shifts in biodiversity when studied alone.

Across study sites where immigration was high, initial diversity within each site began high, but diversity across sites remained low. Over time, the variety of species within individual sites declined as well, as species best suited to the environment gained dominance. Communities stemming from an influx of many individuals from a small number of species were shaped more decisively by local factors.

In sites where highly diverse seed mixes were distributed, species variety remained higher in and across the study sites, resulting in greater local species diversity, and limiting diversity loss over time.

Essentially, local factors are more influential when a particularly well-adapted species can thrive. However, in systems where high biodiversity takes root early on, this variation helps limit one species — even if it has an advantage — from gaining dominance.

These findings suggest that immigration from a highly varied group of species helps maintain species diversity over time, overcoming local ecological factors which would otherwise encourage a single well-adapted species to assert dominance.

This interplay between factors at different scales has long gone understudied and undervalued. Now, these findings may help deepen scientists' understanding of the complex interplay of factors at the regional and local levels which shape ecological communities.

Understanding how these processes shape a region's ecology can better equip scientists to develop powerful conservation strategies, including approaches that could mitigate further biodiversity loss worldwide.

"We wanted to find a way to combine the power of experimental manipulations with the realism and complexity of nature," Brudvig said.

By Caleb Hess

/Public Release. This material from the originating organization/author(s) might be of the point-in-time nature, and edited for clarity, style and length. Mirage.News does not take institutional positions or sides, and all views, positions, and conclusions expressed herein are solely those of the author(s).View in full here.