Tasmania Renters Struggle Amid Rising Costs

National Shelter, SGS Economics and Planning, Housing All Australians

Renting in Greater Hobart is unaffordable even for average income earners, according to the 11th annual National Shelter-SGS Economics and Planning Rental Affordability Index released today.

The index, which compares rents to incomes, found the city's affordability has declined by 1% in the past year, with the lack of rental housing and low share of medium and high-density homes, which can be more affordable to smaller households, contributing to the problem.

The Rental Affordability Index now includes Housing All Australians as a key partner, reflecting the critical role of business and public-private partnerships in addressing the nation's housing crisis.

The Index found even average earners are on the cusp of rental stress with the median rent of $520 taking up 28% of the median rental household income of $95,803 per year.

Launceston, Devonport and Burnie are also classed as 'unaffordable', with 'acceptable' rents confined to smaller towns like Queenstown and St Helens.

The situation remains serious for low-income households, with people receiving JobSeeker, pensioners, and single parents working part-time facing 'extremely' or 'severely' unaffordable rents.

"The high cost of rent is forcing families to skip meals, pushing people on low and moderate incomes into homelessness and preventing women and children from escaping family and domestic violence," said Shelter Tas Acting CEO Dr Lauren McGrow.

"Homelessness services are reporting that even workers and families who have never struggled before cannot find an affordable place to call home. We must urgently build more social and affordable homes to take pressure off the private housing market, and strengthen renters' rights."

SGS Economics & Planning Senior Associate Kishan Ratnam said: "Hobart's renters are paying only 10% less than their Melbourne counterparts - even though their incomes are 22% lower."

"All areas within Hobart are 'Moderately Unaffordable' or worse, unlike Melbourne and Sydney, which retain small clusters of 'Acceptable' rents on their outer fringes."

"Rising rents are likely driven by an insufficient supply of rental housing and by Hobart's low share of medium-and high-density dwellings."

The report found that even for a couple both earning minimum wage, Hobart rents were 'moderately unaffordable'.

Dan McKenna, CEO of Housing All Australians, which has recently become a partner in the Affordability Index, said the rental crisis was having a major negative impact on Tasmania's economy and communities.

"When workers cannot find an affordable place to live, this holds back Tasmania's productivity and prosperity," said Mr McKenna.

"Housing that people can afford is absolutely critical economic infrastructure and without it our prosperity is being held back. Governments can't fill our housing shortfall on their own and so innovative public-private partnerships will continue to be absolutely vital to turning this crisis around."

Greater Hobart

Household

RAI score

Rent as a share of income

Relative Unaffordability

Single pensioner

68

44%

Severely unaffordable

Pensioner couple

80

38%

Severely unaffordable

Single person on benefits

43

71%

Extremely unaffordable

Single part-time worker parent on benefits

57

53%

Extremely unaffordable

Single working parent

132

23%

Acceptable

Student sharehouse

103

29%

Moderately unaffordable

Single income couple with children

109

28%

Moderately unaffordable

Dual income couple with children

218

14%

Very affordable

Minimum wage couple

119

25%

Moderately unaffordable

Hospitality worker

124

24%

Acceptable

Rest of Tasmania

Household

RAI score

Rent as a share of income

Relative Unaffordability

Single pensioner

79

38%

Severely unaffordable

Pensioner couple

98

31%

Unaffordable

Single person on benefits

50

61%

Extremely unaffordable

Single part-time worker parent on benefits

70

43%

Severely unaffordable

Single working parent

162

19%

Affordable

Student sharehouse

133

23%

Acceptable

Single income couple with children

140

21%

Acceptable

Dual income couple with children

280

11%

Very affordable

Minimum wage couple

146

21%

Acceptable

Hospitality worker

141

21%

Acceptable

/Public Release. This material from the originating organization/author(s) might be of the point-in-time nature, and edited for clarity, style and length. Mirage.News does not take institutional positions or sides, and all views, positions, and conclusions expressed herein are solely those of the author(s).