UN Experts: Peru's Atrocity Crimes Bill Defies Global Standards


Draft legislation before the Peruvian Congress establishing that no one can be prosecuted, sentenced or punished for crimes against humanity or war crimes committed before 1 July 2002, contravenes international standards on the application of statutes of limitations to atrocity crimes, UN experts* warned today.

"The adoption of bill 6951/2023-CR pending approval before the Peruvian Congress, would foreclose the criminal prosecution, conviction and sanction of persons who committed such crimes before July 2002, impeding access to justice, and the right to truth and reparation for the victims," the experts said.

On 6 June 2024, the Plenary of the Congress voted in favour of the Bill which proposes the application of statute of limitations in such circumstances. If approved, no act prior to that date would be qualifiable as a crime against humanity or a war crime. A second vote by the plenary is necessary for the legislature to pass the law.

"The adoption of the bill would put Peru in stark contravention of its obligations under international law," the experts said. "Indeed, statutes of limitations cannot not apply to gross violations of international human rights law and serious violations of international humanitarian law which constitute crimes under international law."

"The imprescriptibility of crimes against humanity is a norm of jus cogens and of customary international law, from which no derogation is permitted and to which Peru must adhere," they said.

"At a time when most nations have reformed their domestic legislation to comply with this fundamental principle, bill 6951/2023-CR clashes the international community's basic values, it encourages impunity and is in patent contradiction with the Rule of law."

They called on the legislative branch to ensure that norms passed by Congress fully comply with international law and human rights standards.

/Public Release. This material from the originating organization/author(s) might be of the point-in-time nature, and edited for clarity, style and length. Mirage.News does not take institutional positions or sides, and all views, positions, and conclusions expressed herein are solely those of the author(s).View in full here.