Concordia Study: Canada's Parks Must Limit Fragmentation

Concordia University

According to a Concordia-led study, Canada's national parks may still be struggling to protect landscapes from fragmentation as effectively as intended.

The researchers examined whether Canada's national parks have been successful at preventing fragmentation of park landscapes by transportation infrastructure, agriculture and other barriers that restrict wildlife movement across their landscapes.

The study analyzed 43 national parks and national park reserves across Canada and compared them with nearby unprotected areas from the year they were designated protected areas to 2020. The researchers mapped roads, railways, built-up areas, industrial facilities, agricultural land, water bodies and other features using historical maps and digital geographic datasets. Then they compared changes inside parks with the nearby controls.

Using a metric called effective mesh size, the researchers estimated how easily animals can move through a landscape. Larger mesh sizes indicate more connected landscapes, while smaller ones indicate greater fragmentation.

About half of the parks and control areas experienced little change in mesh size over time, mostly in remote regions. However, fragmentation increased faster in roughly 35 percent of parks than in comparable unprotected areas, while only about 15 per cent were fragmented more slowly than their control areas. This suggests that park protection has been only partly successful at preventing fragmentation.

On average, older parks with long histories of tourism and transportation infrastructure generally became more fragmented than nearby unprotected landscapes. Protection was most effective in the Taiga, the Prairies, Pacific Maritime (the region along the coast of British Columbia) and Arctic ecozones. In contrast, park protection was least successful in the Cordilleras (including the Rocky Mountains) and Hudson (the southern shoreline of the Hudson Bay) ecozones.

Banff, Jasper, Yoho, Kootenay, Prince Albert and La Mauricie are examples of national parks where fragmentation has increased more substantially than in unprotected areas.

The team says the results indicate that landscape fragmentation should be monitored carefully to disclose trends over long periods and to assess the effects of Parks Canada's various management strategies.

The paper was written by Clara Freeman-Cole, MSc student, and Jochen Jaeger, a professor in the Department of Geography, Planning and Environment. It was published in the journal Environmental Monitoring and Assessment.

Read the paper: "How effective have Canadian national parks been at preventing landscape fragmentation?"

/Public Release. This material from the originating organization/author(s) might be of the point-in-time nature, and edited for clarity, style and length. Mirage.News does not take institutional positions or sides, and all views, positions, and conclusions expressed herein are solely those of the author(s).View in full here.