High Blood Pressure Still Biggest Killer Of Australians

New research led by The George Institute for Global Health and UNSW Sydney confirms that high blood pressure (hypertension) persists as the leading cause of death in Australia, reinforcing the need for a concerted national effort to shift the dial on blood pressure control.

Published today in the international journal PLOS ONE, the new study confirmed that in the 30 years between 1990 and 2019, raised systolic blood pressure (SBP)* remained the leading risk factor for deaths with an identified cause, followed by dietary risks and tobacco use.1

Beyond the well-known links with serious cardiovascular conditions, high blood pressure is also implicated in cognitive decline and poorer outcomes in COVID, as well as kidney disease and pregnancy complications; yet it is readily treated with medication, and diet and lifestyle changes.

In Australia, 34% of adults have high blood pressure2 - it is estimated that a 25% reduction could save approximately 37,000 lives annually.3 Only 32% of Australians with hypertension have reduced their blood pressures to within the healthy range, compared to 68% of people in Canada.4 Around half of Australians with high blood pressure are not aware they have it.5

"Effective population-level blood pressure control is an urgent national health priority. Australia lags well behind other high-income countries in blood pressure control and this study shows it is past time for us to act," said lead author, Alta Schutte, Professor of Cardiovascular Medicine from The George Institute and UNSW. "Prevention, detection, and effective treatment are our best weapons against heart disease and stroke. We have these weapons, and we should be using them."

Researchers analysed three decades of Australian data from 1990 to 2019 in the Global Burden of Disease Study to determine the leading risk factors related to deaths overall and to cardiovascular deaths specifically in that time.

According to the analysis, raised SBP contributed to 24% of deaths (29,056 people) from all causes in Australia in 1990, dropping to 14% (21,845) in 2010 and remaining static at 14% (25,498) in 2019. In a similar pattern, raised SBP contributed to 54%, 44% and 44% of cardiovascular-related deaths in 1990, 2010 and 2019 respectively.1 With the data showing an initial improvement but no subsequent reduction during the past decade, there is a need for renewed attention and investment.

"We know from the existing body of evidence that the initial effect was likely due to the arrival of new medications," Prof. Schutte continued. "It is hard to pinpoint exactly why we are losing ground, but we do know that refocusing on ensuring effective detection and treatment in primary care would move the dial.

"We also know that there are better approaches to treatment now. Single pill combination therapies that combine two or three low-dose blood pressure lowering medications in one not only more effective in lowering blood pressure, but also easier for people to take consistently, and cheaper."

Age and gender differences were also discovered in the study. The contribution of raised blood pressure to stroke-related deaths in men aged 25-49 years was higher than other age groups, exceeding 60% and increasing steeply over time between 1990 and 2019, raising concerns that this group may be falling through the cracks.1

"As the evidence shows, elevated blood pressure can occur at any age, so it is an important thing to screen for in people of any age or sex," commented Professor Garry Jennings, Chief Medical Advisor at the National Heart Foundation, also an author on the paper.

"In particular, men younger than 50 would be advised to have their blood pressure checked at their next GP appointment," he said.

Prof. Schutte and Prof. Jennings, along with Prof. Markus Schlaich, chair of Hypertension Australia, are authors on the paper and founding members of the National Hypertension Taskforce, which was established in 2022 and officially launched by the Australian Government in December that year.

The taskforce, a partnership between the Australian Cardiovascular Alliance and Hypertension Australia, aims to improve Australia's blood pressure control rates from 32% to 70% by 2030 and will release its first roadmap to towards this goal on 18 March 2024 at Parliament House, Canberra.

* Systolic blood pressure refers to the force produced in the arteries when the heart beats and pushes blood out into the body; diastolic blood pressure is the pressure when the heart is at rest. Reflected in the upper number of a blood pressure reading, higher systolic pressures are associated with a greater risk of stroke and heart disease compared with elevated diastolic pressures.

References

  1. Xiaoyue Xu, Sheikh Mohammed Shariful Islam, Markus Schlaich, Garry Jennings, Aletta E Schutte. The contribution of raised blood pressure to all-cause and cardiovascular deaths and disability-adjusted life-years (DALYs) in Australia: Analysis of Global Burden of Disease Study from 1990 to 2019. PLOS ONE. February 21, 2024, doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0297229
  2. Australian Institute of Health and Welfare. High blood pressure. Canberra, 2019. https://www.aihw.gov.au/reports/risk-factors/high-blood-pressure/contents/summary. Accessed February 2024
  3. Hird TR, Zomer E, Owen AJ, Magliano DJ, Liew D, Ademi ZJH. Productivity burden of hypertension in Australia: a life table modelling study. Hypertension 2019; 73(4): 777-84
  4. Zhou B, Carrillo-Larco RM, Danaei G, et al. Worldwide trends in hypertension prevalence and progress in treatment and control from 1990 to 2019: a pooled analysis of 1201 population-representative studies with 104 million participants. Lancet 2021; 398(10304): 957-80
  5. Carnagarin R, et al. May Measurement Month 2018: an analysis of blood pressure screening results from Australia. Eur Heart J Suppl 2020; 22: H17-h9. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/suaa018
/Public Release. This material from the originating organization/author(s) might be of the point-in-time nature, and edited for clarity, style and length. Mirage.News does not take institutional positions or sides, and all views, positions, and conclusions expressed herein are solely those of the author(s).View in full here.