Only 9% of Major Companies Use Biodiversity Indicators, Study Finds

Researchers from Lund University reviewed sustainability reports from 89 of the world's largest companies operating in the sectors with the greatest impact on biodiversity: food, beverages, tobacco, apparel, chemicals, construction, energy and mining. Eight of the companies reported using biodiversity indicators to inform their decisions. However, only two of the eight reported using more than one indicator, something the researchers can now show is of great importance.

"Different indicators measure different aspects of nature. Our results show that no single biodiversity indicator provides a complete picture. Companies that rely on only one indicator may therefore make decisions that protect one biodiversity value while damaging another," says William Sidemo Holm, one of the researchers behind the study.

One indicator may not be enough

In the new study, the researchers conducted analyses comparing four different indicators. The results show that the indicators often differ in their assessments of how important a geographical area is for biodiversity. A company that uses only one indicator risks concluding that an area is of little importance for biodiversity, even though it may be highly valuable from perspectives that the particular indicator does not capture.

"If companies want to understand and report their impact on biodiversity accurately, they need to use several indicators rather than a single measure. Indicators can play a crucial role in informing decisions that affect biodiversity, but there is still considerable room for improvement in how they are used today," says William Sidemo Holm.