New Brunswick, NJ, September 5, 2025 -- When hospitalized patients struggle to breathe, doctors typically reach for their stethoscopes, but results from a Rutgers and RWJBarnabas Health clinical study in JAMA Network Open suggest they should diagnose the problem with portable ultrasounds instead.
The study found initial exams with portable ultrasounds led to better diagnoses, shorter hospital stays and big cost savings. However, the findings revealed a need for additional training and workflow integration to help clinicians transition from traditional tools to this promising new technology.
"The study clearly shows that ultrasound is the superior diagnostic technology, even for long-time stethoscope users who get a few hours of ultrasound training," said senior study author Partho Sengupta, Henry Rutgers professor and chief of cardiology at Rutgers Robert Wood Johnson Medical School (RWJMS), chief of cardiology at Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital (RWJUH) and member of the RWJBarnabas Health Medical Group.
The study enrolled 208 patients admitted with shortness of breath to Robert Wood Johnson University Hospital in New Brunswick. About half of them underwent diagnosis via point-of-care ultrasound devices that attach to smartphones. The rest underwent diagnosis via existing standards of care.
Initial diagnosis with ultrasound trimmed a patient's average length of hospital stay from 11.9 days to 8.3 days. In all, initial diagnosis with ultrasound saved 246 bed-days and about $751,000 in direct costs across the cohort, while 30-day readmissions were similar between groups.
