Trump Follows Autocrat Playbook to Sideline Courts

In democratic systems, the courts are a vital check on a leader's power. They have the ability to overturn laws and, in Donald Trump's case, the executive orders he has relied on to achieve his goals.

Author

  • Justin Bergman

    International Affairs Editor, The Conversation

Since taking office, Trump has targeted the judiciary with a vengeance. He has attacked what he has called " radical left judges " and is accused of ignoring or evading court orders.

The Supreme Court has already handed the Trump administration some key wins in his second term. But several cases now before the court will be pivotal in determining how much power Trump is able to accrue - and what he'll be able to do with it.

As Paul Collins, a Supreme Court expert from the University of Massachusetts-Amherst, explains in episode 4 of The Making of an Autocrat:

It's all about presidential power. And that's really significant because it's going to enable the president to basically inject a level of politics into the federal bureaucracy that we frankly haven't really seen before in the US.

Listen to the interview with Paul Collins at The Making of an Autocrat podcast.

This episode was written by Justin Bergman and produced and edited by Isabella Podwinski and Ashlynne McGhee. Sound design by Michelle Macklem.

Newsclips in this episode from CBS News , The White House , Associated Press , NPR , Spain's Culture Ministry .

Listen to The Conversation Weekly via any of the apps listed above, download it directly via our RSS feed or find out how else to listen here . A transcript of this episode is available via the Apple Podcasts or Spotify apps.

The Conversation

Paul Collins does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.

/Courtesy of The Conversation. This material from the originating organization/author(s) might be of the point-in-time nature, and edited for clarity, style and length. Mirage.News does not take institutional positions or sides, and all views, positions, and conclusions expressed herein are solely those of the author(s).