Productivity Commission Probes Housing Supply Rules

Cement Concrete & Aggregates Australia

Key Facts:

  • The Federal Government has directed the Productivity Commission to examine regulatory systems affecting housing supply across Australia, a move welcomed by Cement Concrete & Aggregates Australia (CCAA).
  • The cement, concrete and aggregates industry contributes $20.7 billion to GDP, supports 112,970 jobs nationally, and underpins Australia's $175 billion construction sector and $242 billion public infrastructure pipeline.
  • CCAA CEO Michael Kilgariff said the inquiry is a critical opportunity to address planning, approvals, and infrastructure bottlenecks that are constraining housing delivery, raising costs, and reducing construction productivity.
  • CCAA highlighted that timely housing delivery requires secure access to construction materials, efficient freight networks, and planning systems that recognise the importance of quarry resources and concrete batching infrastructure.
  • CCAA is calling for regulatory reform focused on reducing duplication, improving consistency across jurisdictions, and establishing clearer, nationally consistent frameworks to support faster approvals and greater investment certainty.

Cement Concrete & Aggregates Australia (CCAA) has welcomed the Federal Government's decision to direct the Productivity Commission to examine the regulatory systems impacting housing supply across Australia.

Recent Oxford Economics Australia analysis found the cement, concrete and aggregates industry contributes $20.7 billion to GDP and supports 112,970 jobs nationally. The industry also enables Australia's $175 billion construction sector and supports delivery of the nation's $242 billion public infrastructure pipeline.

CCAA Chief Executive Officer Michael Kilgariff said the inquiry is an important opportunity to address the planning, approvals and infrastructure bottlenecks that continue to constrain housing delivery, increase costs and reduce construction productivity.

"Australia cannot meet its housing targets without faster, more coordinated and more efficient regulatory systems," Mr Kilgariff said.

"The current complexity across planning, environmental and development approval processes is slowing the delivery of new housing and the infrastructure needed to support growing communities."

CCAA said the inquiry's focus on approval processes, land availability and infrastructure delivery reflects many of the long-standing barriers identified by industry.

"Timely housing delivery depends on secure access to essential construction materials, efficient freight networks and planning systems that properly recognise the importance of quarry resources and concrete batching infrastructure," Mr Kilgariff said.

"Without better coordination across jurisdictions, streamlined approval pathways and improved infrastructure planning, Australia risks increasing costs, delaying projects and placing further pressure on housing supply."

CCAA said regulatory reform should focus on reducing duplication, improving consistency across jurisdictions and supporting performance-based approaches that maintain important environmental and safety outcomes while improving productivity.

"There is significant scope to improve housing supply outcomes through clearer, more predictable and nationally consistent regulatory frameworks," Mr Kilgariff said.

"This inquiry provides an important opportunity to identify practical reforms that support faster approvals, improve investment certainty and help deliver more homes where Australians need them."

About us:

About CCAA CCAA is the voice of Australia's heavy construction materials industry, an industry that contributes $20.7 billion to GDP and supports 112,970 jobs nationwide. CCAA members produce most of Australia's cement, concrete and aggregates, which are essential to the nation's building and construction sectors.

/Public Release. This material from the originating organization/author(s) might be of the point-in-time nature, and edited for clarity, style and length. Mirage.News does not take institutional positions or sides, and all views, positions, and conclusions expressed herein are solely those of the author(s).