Feasibility study into uptake of reusable nappies

The City of Stonnington has taken part in a reusable nappy feasibility study with 11 other Melbourne councils to research and understand how to implement a best practice reusable nappy program.

With Councils estimating five to 15 per cent of household landfill bins contain disposable nappies (by weight), the study explored how to best reduce disposable nappy waste to landfill, support parents and carers and increase both first-time and continued use of reusable nappies.

The five-month study included a review of nine Melbourne-based, four Australia-wide, three international reusable nappy programs, and 12 reusable nappy brands – including a triple-bottom line assessment. Social research was also undertaken with 2,282 expectant parents and current parents and carers across Melbourne.

This research found 34 per cent of participants used a combination of reusable and disposable nappies, with 18 per cent using reusable nappies only. With as many as 90 per cent of expectant parents and carers open to assistance to make the switch to reusables through interventions like workshops, trial kits, or advice from a trusted source.

Removing cost as a barrier was not a prominent reason for continued use of reusable nappies amongst current users, and people who were already using reusable nappies were more than twice as likely as those who use disposables to find a rebate appealing.

To support ongoing use and uptake, the study recommends councils deliver more education and more opportunities for expectant families and the community to experience and connect with reusable nappy programs and products.

Read the Reusable Nappy Feasibility Report, including the Executive Summary document.

This project is supported by the Circular Economy Councils Fund, delivered by Sustainability Victoria on behalf of the Victorian Government.

/Public Release. This material from the originating organization/author(s) might be of the point-in-time nature, and edited for clarity, style and length. Mirage.News does not take institutional positions or sides, and all views, positions, and conclusions expressed herein are solely those of the author(s).View in full here.