Fired UNRWA Staff Back Bombings, Linked to Hamas

UN Watch

Key Findings on Fired UNRWA Employees:

  • 1. Mohammed M. Issa: Publicly lionized senior Hamas military commanders, called on the “resistance” to abduct more Israeli citizens to initiate prisoner exchanges, and distributed highly disturbing propaganda imagery of infants holding automatic weapons.
  • 2. Mohammad Juma Shuwaideh: Publicly exposed by state intelligence as a Hamas squad commander, openly rejected institutional neutrality mandates, and maintained administrative oversight of a facility beneath which an operational terrorist attack tunnel network operated.
  • 3. Mohamed Ghorab: Explicitly celebrated the October 7th massacres as “blessed,” publicly praised a family-linked militant who served 22 years for a violent stabbing attack, and openly used his digital footprint to publish explicit calls to jihad.

Last week, Acting Commissioner-General of UNRWA, Christian Saunders, announced the immediate termination of 70 staff members in the Gaza Strip. UNRWA’s official statement expressly stated that the terminations were “not part of a disciplinary process” and that they are not intended as “a validation of the claims made against” the employees. Instead, the statement carefully framed the decision as a precautionary measure taken under its legal framework to mitigate “safety and security risks” for both its personnel and the refugees it serves.

The statement’s inherent contradiction was exposed when the UN spokesman was unable to explain why UNRWA would terminate 70 employees if the decision was neither punitive nor evidence-based. Instead, he said only that “the situation in UNRWA is rather complex and challenging,” and that the Commissioner-General sometimes must take “decisions that are not easy to take, but that are in the best interest of the Organization.”

It’s clear that UNRWA is engaging in damage control: removing terrorists from its staff lists while continuing to deny to donor states that it employed them in the first place.

Despite UNRWA’s measured language, Palestinian militant factions, local staff unions, and political committees immediately erupted in protest:

  • The Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine (DFLP), which participated in the October 7th massacre, vowed that the firings “must not go unpunished.”
  • The militant group “Ahrar Movement” condemned the action as “a clear capitulation to the pressures and political blackmail exerted by the Israeli occupation on international institutions operating in Palestine.”
  • The Joint Committee for Palestinian Refugees, led by Mahmoud Khalaf-a close ally of Hamas Politburo member and former President of the UNRWA staff unions, Suhail al-Hindi-stated his “complete rejection of the decision to dismiss staff based on legally unsubstantiated accusations.”
  • Suhail al-Hindi himself stated, “UNRWA’s decision to dismiss dozens of employees from Gaza is a stab in the back of Gaza and its resilience.”
  • Mustafa al-Ghoul, the Hamas-affiliated current president of the UNRWA staff union in Gaza, complained that the “number of Arab employees in UNRWA in Gaza has decreased from about 13,000 to about 9,600 employees as a result of dismissals, martyrdom and resignations.”
  • Rania Madi, senior advisor at Law for Palestine, stated that these are “serious and fabricated accusations directed at UNRWA to label it as supporting terrorism, simply because some of its employees express their support for the rights of their people, or because one of their family members has a connection to the Palestinian resistance…”
  • The Palestinian Mujahideen Movement called it “submission to Zionist pressure” and “political blackmail.”

Collectively, these groups echo a core argument: UNRWA is unjustly punishing workers simply for expressing solidarity with the Palestinian cause or because of their family ties, violating the basic principle of “innocent until proven guilty.”

However, a look at what some of these dismissed employees consider acceptable behavior reveals a massive disconnect between local definitions of “patriotism” and what basic neutrality requires. Below, we expose the only three recently fired employees who have publicly admitted to being fired and continue to allege their innocence despite shamelessly portraying everything the UN is supposed to stand against.


1. Mohammed M. Issa

Mohammed M. Issa Profile

On June 12, 2026, Mohammed M. Issa lamented on Facebook about being one of the 70 employees fired from UNRWA (archive link). Issa’s public defense was absolute:

“I categorically affirm that I do not belong to Hamas, have never belonged to it, and oppose it ideologically and politically. I also do not belong to any other organization. I will use all available legal means to challenge this decision.”

Mohammed M. Issa Statement

To his credit, Issa’s recent digital footprint does show genuine frustration with Hamas, mostly driven by the well-documented anger of Palestinians with Hamas’s leadership, who escaped to the Four Seasons in Doha, Qatar while leaving their populations to suffer the consequences of their actions. In November 2024, Issa vented his frustration via a joke on Facebook about what the leader of Hamas, Khalil al-Hayya, was having for dinner:

Hamas Leadership Dinner Post

Yet, while Issa may not carry an official Hamas membership card, his self-proclaimed “neutrality” completely disintegrates upon reviewing his extensive social media history.

Exhibit 1: Public Support for Hamas Commanders

  • Shared a post (archive link) celebrating Raed Al-Attar (Abu Ayman) and Muhammad Abu Shamala (Abu Khalil). Raed al-Attar served as the commander of the Rafah company for the Izz ad-Din al-Qassam Brigades. Muhammad Abu Shamala was a leader of the Izz ad-Din al-Qassam Brigades of Hamas, serving as the sub-commander of the southern Gaza Strip.
  • Published a post (archive link) celebrating Emad Akel, the deceased commander of the Izz al-Din al-Qassam Brigades.

Exhibit 2: Celebration of Terrorists and Suicide Bombers

Suicide Bomber Support Proof 1
Suicide Bomber Support Proof 2
  • Published a post (archive link) supporting Umm Nidal Farhat, known as the “Mother of Martyrs” for her vocal backing of her sons’ suicide bombings. She later became a member of Hamas.
  • Shared a post (archive link) eulogizing Hamas terrorist Mohammed Assi, who helped organize a bus bombing in Tel Aviv that wounded 29 civilians.
  • Shared a post (archive link) celebrating Samer Issawi, who was sentenced to 26 years in prison in 2002 for executing shooting attacks targeting Israeli police cars and university students at Hebrew University in Jerusalem.
  • Shared a post (archive link) celebrating Abdul Basit Odeh, the Izz ad-Din al-Qassam Brigades operative who carried out the horrific Park Hotel suicide bombing in Netanya, killing 30 people during a Passover seder.

Exhibit 3: Calls for the Abduction of Israelis

Abduction Call Proof
  • Published a post (archive link) explicitly demanding that the “resistance” capture more Israeli soldiers to force future prisoner leverage exchanges.
  • Published a post (archive link) calling for “a new Gilad,” referencing Gilad Shalit, the Israeli soldier who was captured and held hostage in Gaza for five years.

Exhibit 4: Incitement and Militant Alignment

Mohammed Issa shared an explicit image of an active combatant paired with the phrase “glory to the resistance.” (archive link)

Exhibit 4 - Militant Photo

Mohammed has also “dreamt that a missile launched at Tel Aviv accidentally hit a Zionist F-16 fighter jet in the skies over the Gaza Strip.” He adds, “It’s difficult, almost impossible, but worth the wait and the dream…” (Archive Link)

Exhibit 4 - Militant Photo

Exhibit 5: Armed Radicalization of Infants

Issa repeatedly shared deeply unsettling, militant propaganda photos portraying literal infants holding real automatic weapons. (archive link 1) (archive link 2)

Exhibit 5 - Photo 1
Exhibit 5 - Photo 2

2. Mohammad Juma Shuwaideh (Abu Firas)

UNRWA Terror Network Graphic

On June 11, 2026, a screenshot of a text message sent by Mohammad Juma Shuwaideh confirming his administrative removal was posted (archive link) on Facebook. The text states:

“Praise be to God, before and after. A short while ago, I received the dismissal letter from the Agency [UNRWA]… on the charge of working in an armed organization.”

Shuwaideh Dismissal Text

An organizational comment left on the post directly illuminates the structural footprint Shuwaideh maintained inside UNRWA operations:

”Of course, Abu Firas is the one who has been managing all the agency’s work since the beginning of the war in Gaza, and everyone testifies to him.”

Mohammad Juma Shuwaideh has been tracked by UN Watch for at least two years. In September 2025, he featured heavily within UN Watch’s published investigative report, “Schools in the Grip of Terror,” and was formally included in the comprehensive tracking network, “UNRWA Terror Network”.

Mohammad Juma Shuwaideh (known alternative alias “Abu Fares”) operated administratively as an UNRWA educational headmaster at the UNRWA Zeitoun Prep A Boys School. He has held active, foundational membership within the UNRWA Gaza Staff Union executive circles since at least 2015. Operating in that position, he has publicly defended internal union strikes that crippled vital community services, shielding actions from complaints raised by UNRWA aid recipients. In May 2020, sitting union president Mustafa Al-Ghoul explicitly published an image pairing the two together, introducing Shuwaideh as the acting Union Secretary while warmly terming him “brother.”

Shuwaideh has also publicly opposed UNRWA’s internal attempts to scrub violent or biased entries from regional classroom material. He strongly rejected the sanitization of specific religious texts referencing “jihad” and fought to retain instructional maps depicting sovereign Israeli cities (such as Haifa) entirely as Palestinian domain. He further demanded that UNRWA implement local educational tracking curricula “without any interference,” asserting that basic institutional neutrality criteria represented an explicit attack on foundational “national and Islamic values across both Gaza and the West Bank.”

Crucially, Shuwaideh is among twelve specific UNRWA educators formally and publicly identified by state officials in July 2024 as active militant operatives-explicitly holding a post as a Hamas Squad Commander assigned within the Gaza Brigades organization.

Furthermore, architectural tracking as early as 2021 disclosed that an active Hamas military underground tunnel was built directly beneath the school facility Shuwaideh managed. Despite generic public denunciations from agency headquarters concerning subterranean violations, the tunnel system was confirmed to be fully functional when military forces operated throughout the sector in 2023.

Hamas Tunnel Map 1
Hamas Tunnel Map 2

Regardless of these structural ties, UNRWA kept him on the payroll. On July 20, 2024, Shuwaideh uploaded an image displaying himself wearing an active UN operational vest. Later, on October 19, 2024, Shuwaideh posted a separate photo executing computer work while wearing an official agency-issued UNRWA sweatshirt.

Shuwaideh in UNRWA Uniform

UNRWA finally suspended Shuwaideh on or about April 27, 2025-coincidentally executing the order precisely 24 hours before the Foreign Ministry highlighted his documented Hamas alignment during a high-profile press conference detailing deep structural ties between the aid agency and terror networks. The alignment strongly indicates the tactical suspension was deployed to blunt international backlash, given that agency executives had been formally provided detailed infrastructure files ten months prior without taking an administrative step.

Shuwaideh hails from an influential, highly integrated Hamas family network. He shares direct lineage ties with Ahmed Shuwaideh, the former Hamas Minister of Justice and Prisoners under Ismail Haniyeh. Following his death in 2008, Ahmed was publicly eulogized by Haniyeh as “a towering role model… and a man of steadfastness and jihad.” On his personal channels, Mohammad Shuwaideh directly validated this legacy, characterizing the Hamas leader as “a man loved by all.”

Family Ties Evidence 1
Family Ties Evidence 2

3. Mohamed Ghorab

Mohamed Ghorab Profile

On June 14, an online public Facebook statement (archive link) confirmed that Habib Muhammad Garab (Mohamed Ghorab) was officially among the 70 agency workers removed by UNRWA leadership. Within the community text, he is characterized as a “beloved teacher, well-known in the Shati refugee camp.” Interestingly, this educator never attempted to maintain an illusion of operational neutrality; records reveal he openly detailed direct marital alignment into a family of a convicted militant.

Exhibit 1: Celebration of a Convicted Family Militant

On his public profile, Ghorab directly hailed the high-profile release of militant “hero” Iyad Mahmoud Abu Hashim from captivity. Abu Hashim had finished a 22-year sentence handed down after he attempted a stabbing attack targeting an active soldier at the regional Rafah border crossing structure. Ghorab explicitly stated, “Congratulations to my in-laws, Al Abu Hashim,” clarifying the direct connection binding him to the operative. (Archive link)

Family Terrorist Celebration Proof

Exhibit 2: Support for the October 7th Atrocities

On October 10th, immediately following the massacres across southern Israel, Mohamed Ghorab went online to explicitly validate the actions: (archive link)

“The number of martyrs is far lower than the death tolls from earthquakes and hurricanes; the end is the same, but blessed are those who die as martyrs…”

Mohamed Ghorab Facebook Post

Exhibit 3: Explicit Incitement to Holy Warfare

Ghorab explicitly validated militant radicalism, stating: “The glory of Jihad is a struggle, glory is lined with blood and a struggle.” (archive link)

Jihad Glory Post Proof


Conclusion: A Distorted Standard of Righteousness

The fierce political pushback from Palestinian leadership claims that UNRWA is overstepping, policing thought, and acting without due process. But the cases of Mohammed M. Issa, Mohamed Ghorab, and  Mohammad Juma Shuwaideh highlight a much more systemic problem: a deeply distorted view of what constitutes acceptable behavior for an international humanitarian worker.

For any United Nations agency, an employee openly celebrating a civilian massacre, romanticizing firearms in the hands of infants, and shouting digital praises for masked insurgents is an automatic, undeniable ground for termination. UNRWA’s decision to quietly purge these 70 individuals under the guise of “safety and security” might avoid a messy legal showdown over formal Hamas membership-but as the digital receipts show, the breach of basic human decency and professional neutrality was already hidden in plain sight.

Yet, this initial cohort of 70 terminations represents only the tip of a much larger structural iceberg. Highlighting the scale of institutional infiltration, the USAID Office of Inspector General (OIG) has dramatically expanded its independent federal dragnet, actively investigating up to 1,500 additional UNRWA personnel suspected of harboring direct ties to terrorist organizations.

Working in tandem with international diplomatic channels to intercept institutional security risks, the Inspector General’s office has already added more than 100 terror-linked current and former UNRWA personnel to its systemic employment blacklist. This preventative measure ensures flagged individuals cannot simply circulate to other prominent international aid operations or humanitarian organizations within the UN ecosystem.

While UNRWA continues to deploy calculated ambiguity to insulate itself from accountability, the mounting weight of external oversight investigations proves that the rot within the agency is no longer an open secret-it is a thoroughly documented liability that global donors can no longer afford to ignore.

/Public Release. This material from the originating organization/author(s) might be of the point-in-time nature, and edited for clarity, style and length. Mirage.News does not take institutional positions or sides, and all views, positions, and conclusions expressed herein are solely those of the author(s).View in full here.