U of M Study: Bias-Bullying Increases Distress in Marginalized Youth

University of Minnesota Medical School

MINNEAPOLIS/ST. PAUL (2/13/2024) — Youth who share similar social positions of race, ethnicity, sexual orientation and gender have much greater levels of emotional distress if they have experienced bias-based bullying — defined as racist, homophobic or transphobic bullying — according to a new study from the University of Minnesota Medical School.

The study, published in Pediatrics, analyzed 2019 Minnesota Student Survey data on more than 80,000 students in grades 9 and 11.

"We hear a lot about mental health disparities affecting minority youth, and a common misinterpretation is that 'those kids' have problems. This study really shows that when kids are harassed or bullied for just being who they are — that's the problem, that's where we need to make changes," said Marla Eisenberg, ScD, MPH, a professor at the U of M Medical School and faculty with the School of Public Health.

The research team used models to identify rates of depression, anxiety, self-injury, suicidal ideation and suicide attempts. They found the level of emotional distress was as much as 60% lower among adolescents with the same social positions but no bias-based bullying experience.

The findings suggest bias-based bullying is a contributing factor to emotional distress among youth with multiple marginalized social positions. The authors suggest bias-based bullying is an important point for intervention and mitigation of mental health disparities, particularly among LGBTQ+ adolescents.

The research team is planning to conduct additional research on ways to prevent bias-based bullying and support diverse youth, particularly through schools and social media.

This research was supported by the National Institute on Minority Health and Health Disparities [R01MD015722].

/Public Release. This material from the originating organization/author(s) might be of the point-in-time nature, and edited for clarity, style and length. Mirage.News does not take institutional positions or sides, and all views, positions, and conclusions expressed herein are solely those of the author(s).View in full here.