Urine Test Can Assess Risk Of Kidney Cancer Recurrence

Lund University

A simple urine test that can assess the risk of kidney cancer recurrence at an early stage could spare patients from frequent X-ray examinations and thus reduce the associated radiation, anxiety and costs. This has been shown in a new international research study led by Lund University in Sweden. The results have now been published in European Urology Oncology.

Globally, about 400,000 people are diagnosed with kidney cancer each year. Clear cell renal cell carcinoma is the most common form of kidney cancer among adults, accounting for around 90 per cent of all kidney cancer cases. About one-fifth of those who undergo curative surgery face a relapse within five years. To check for recurrence, the patients need to be X-rayed - normally using computer tomography - one to two times per year. Scanning entails both radiation exposure and anxiety for many patients.
However, a new international study involving 134 patients from 23 hospitals in ten countries, shows that a simple urine test could halve the number of X-ray examinations. The urine is analysed to identify certain types of sugar molecules called glycosaminoglycans. The composition of these molecules can serve as biomarkers, known as a GAGome test, in the detection of cancer recurrence.

"The GAGome test is based on a set of biomarkers, rather than just one molecule, which provides a more robust foundation for making decisions about treatment. If the test comes back negative, we are more or less certain that there is no recurrence, but if the test is positive, we must continue to investigate," says Saeed Dabestani, associate professor at Lund University and senior urology consultant at Kristianstad Central Hospital.

He led the study in which patients who had curative surgery underwent X-ray examinations, supplemented by regular urine tests, as part of their standard follow-up. The GAGome test was shown to be extremely sensitive regarding the detection of recurrence and could correctly identify 90 per cent of the patients whose cancer had come back. More importantly, emphasises Saeed Dabestani, is that a negative GAGome test resulted in a highly reliable 97 per cent chance that the patient had not had a relapse.

He considers that the test provides significant advantages over simply using scanning:

"An X-ray often captures small changes that are not large enough for taking a tissue sample and therefore we don't know if they are signs that the cancer has returned. Our only option is then to carry out more frequent X-ray examinations, which cause anxiety for the patients and often have little benefit. Using urine tests enables us to better assess the risk, offer more effective checks and potentially halve the number of X-ray examinations."

The new test could mean identification of cancer recurrence at an earlier stage, a reduction in radiation exposure and patient anxiety, and lower healthcare costs. However, more research is needed to ascertain if ultimately it will save more lives.

"Further research is needed to confirm the effectiveness of the GAGome test in clinical practice. Our study therefore includes a further group of participants who will be assessed towards the end of 2025 to confirm our current results."

The GAGome test is being developed by a Swedish diagnostics company and has not yet been approved for clinical use in diagnostic procedures.

Quick facts: peer-reviewed // randomized controlled trial // study conducted on humans

Countries included in the study: Sweden, UK, Italy, Denmark, USA, Canada, France, Portugal, Spain and Finland.

Publication

Urine Glycosaminoglycan Scores for Surveillance of Recurrence in Intermediate and High-risk Non-metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma - An Observational Prospective Multicenter Diagnostic Test Cohort Study, European Urology Oncology, 2025

DOI: 10.1016/j.euo.2025.07.011

/Public Release. This material from the originating organization/author(s) might be of the point-in-time nature, and edited for clarity, style and length. Mirage.News does not take institutional positions or sides, and all views, positions, and conclusions expressed herein are solely those of the author(s).View in full here.