ACNC: Charities can contribute to Voice referendum

Australian Charities and Not-for-profits Commission

The national regulator has released information for charities considering contributing to conversations taking place about the Australian Government's planned referendum on an Indigenous Voice to Parliament.

Australian Charities and Not-for-profits Commissioner Sue Woodward AM said the sector can make a valuable contribution.

"Charities can engage in advocacy activities and they often do. This year, some charities might want to advocate for a particular outcome on the referendum," Ms Woodward said.

"If a charity plans to undertake advocacy activities, it must be able to demonstrate how it believes its advocacy furthers its charitable purpose – the purpose set out in its Constitution.

"In the case of the planned referendum, some charities may just want to make a statement of support for the 'yes' or 'no' case. An example would be a message in the charity's email signature block. This would not jeopardise their registration with the ACNC," Ms Woodward said.

'Charities, Advocacy and the Planned Referendum on An Indigenous Voice to Parliament ' is now available on the ACNC website.

It explains that the people responsible for running a charity - such as Directors, CEOs and senior workers (paid or volunteer) - should be clear about how their charity will advocate. They should also be clear about the type of thing that can be said and done in the name of their charity and they should set boundaries.

Further, it explains it is important that advocacy is lawful, respectful and fair as this helps ensure the charity and its leaders meet their obligations under the ACNC's Governance Standards.

The ACNC also has more detailed information on advocacy by registered charities and charities, campaigning and advocacy which can help charities make decisions about their contributions to the conversation on the referendum.

F

/Public Release. This material from the originating organization/author(s) might be of the point-in-time nature, and edited for clarity, style and length. Mirage.News does not take institutional positions or sides, and all views, positions, and conclusions expressed herein are solely those of the author(s).