Amsterdam, The Netherlands – Greenpeace International's landmark anti-SLAPP lawsuit against Energy Transfer took another step forward in the Amsterdam District Court, today. The hearing reviewed the pipeline company's latest attempt to avoid accountability under Dutch law and the European Union's anti-SLAPP directive for back-to-back abusive lawsuits filed in the US.[1] Netherlands-based Greenpeace International is seeking legal recognition that Energy Transfer has acted unlawfully as well as relief from the harm that has resulted. The Court said it would make a decision by 3 June 2026 on Energy Transfer's plea for dismissal or pause of the anti-SLAPP lawsuit.[2]
Mads Christensen, Greenpeace International, Executive Director said: "Energy Transfer cannot hide from justice - no matter how hard they try. Greenpeace International is holding this Big Oil bully accountable under Dutch and EU law for repeated attempts at silencing our free speech. We will continue to resist all forms of intimidation and believe Energy Transfer will have to answer for its actions here in the Netherlands."
"With the world's continued dependence on fossil fuels wreaking havoc around the globe, Greenpeace International's anti-SLAPP landmark case against Energy Transfer is bigger than us: This is about stopping corporations from weaponising the courts against anyone who dares to speak out for the public good."
Energy Transfer's back-to-back lawsuits against Greenpeace International and the Greenpeace organisations in the US (Greenpeace Inc. and Greenpeace Fund) remain blatant attempts to silence free speech, erase Indigenous leadership of the Standing Rock movement, and punish solidarity with the ongoing, peaceful resistance to the Dakota Access Pipeline.[3] These are clear-cut examples of SLAPPs - lawsuits attempting to bury nonprofits and activists in legal fees and ultimately silence dissent.
Daniel Simons, Senior Legal Counsel Strategic Defense, Greenpeace International said: "Energy Transfer continues attempting to evade accountability because it knows it cannot justify its repeated abusive lawsuits. We feel confident the court will allow Greenpeace International's anti-SLAPP case to proceed on the merits and that Energy Transfer will face justice. We carry on this legal fight to remedy the harms suffered as a result of Energy Transfer's intimidation tactics and to ensure corporate bullies know there is now a price to pay if you bring SLAPP suits."
In parallel to the anti-SLAPP case in the Netherlands, Greenpeace International and Greenpeace organisations in the US continue the legal fight against Energy Transfer's most recent SLAPP in North Dakota. Following a District Court judgment awarding US$345 million to Energy Transfer in February 2026, the Greenpeace defendants are seeking a new trial and, if necessary, will appeal the decision with the North Dakota Supreme Court.[4]
The 16 April hearing in Greenpeace International's landmark anti-SLAPP case against Big Oil bully Energy Transfer marks the beginning of a series of organising, marches, and activities around the world collectively called Facing Down Bullies.
