China's Moon Sample Updates Lunar Chronology Model

Chinese Academy of Sciences

Researchers led by Prof. YUE Zongyu and Prof. DI Kaichang from the Aerospace Information Research Institute (AIR) of the Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) and their collaborators have established an updated lunar chronology model that provides a more accurate timescale not just for lunar history but also for the evolution of planetary bodies in the inner solar system.

The research is based on the radiometric age of new samples collected by China's Chang'E-5 from the Moon along with crater counting in the landing area.

The study was published in Nature Astronomy on Feb. 14.

In lunar and planetary studies, it is essential to determine the age of important geologic units and events. Previous lunar samples were collected from the Moon by the Apollo and Luna missions between 1969 and 1976. Their ages were radiometrically measured as older than three billion and younger than one billion years old, which represent the real ages of the geologic units where the samples were situated.

These samples provided the basis for establishing the crater counting method whereby the age of unsampled lunar regions could be deduced from known sample information and the crater statistics of specific geologic units.

Unfortunately, the gap in age of two billion years between the samples represents almost half of lunar geologic history, thus making this chronology model questionable.

Since the previous samples mostly cover those older regions, one of the scientific objectives of the Chang'E-5 mission was to search the lunar surface for younger samples (i.e., about two billion years old) in order to verify and refine the lunar chronology model.

In December 2020, China's Chang'E-5 landed on the Northern Oceanus Procellarum, or "Ocean of Storms," near Rümker Mountain and Rima Sharp. The age of the returned samples was radiometrically measured at 2.03 billion years, which is highly consistent with expectations.

/Public Release. This material from the originating organization/author(s) might be of the point-in-time nature, and edited for clarity, style and length. Mirage.News does not take institutional positions or sides, and all views, positions, and conclusions expressed herein are solely those of the author(s).View in full here.