Rapid assessments to turbocharge NSW Planning System

Assessments for state significant projects such as schools and hospitals will be cut by three-quarters in a major overhaul of the NSW planning system to make it more efficient and timely.

Minister for Planning and Public Spaces Rob Stokes said the new Rapid Assessments Framework would cut unnecessary and time consuming steps in the assessment of major projects.

"For projects that are more straightforward and low risk - such as warehouses, schools, hospitals - we are slashing timeframes for initial assessment steps from 28 days to just seven days," Mr Stokes said.

"At the moment, every major project is treated the same as a coal mine where comprehensive and costly environmental impact statements are required.

"Without compromising on the quality or robustness of assessments, it is a common sense approach to speeding up the process to get important projects moving."

The new Rapid Assessments Framework will include:

  • Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) summaries not be longer than 200 pages
  • Certification of EISs by an accredited professional practitioner will be required before submission
  • Initial assessment steps for more straightforward State Significant Development projects will be cut from 28 days to seven days
  • Clear guidance for assessment of "cumulative impacts" of projects
  • Streamlined lodgement processes for applicants

"Major projects vary in scale, complexity and impact so we're moving from a one-size-fits-all approach to more tailored assessment process," he said.

"Coal mines are still coal mines and assessed as such, but projects should be assessed in a timeframe that is proportionate to the impacts."

The Rapid Assessments Framework is on public exhibition from today until February 12, 2021 with implementation planned for mid-2021.

/Public Release. This material from the originating organization/author(s) might be of the point-in-time nature, and edited for clarity, style and length. Mirage.News does not take institutional positions or sides, and all views, positions, and conclusions expressed herein are solely those of the author(s).View in full here.