Ozempic Offers Superior Reductions in HbA1c and Body Weight Compared to Both Victoza and Canagliflozin

BAGSV�RD, Denmark, Sept. 18, 2019 /PRNewswire/ --

Novo Nordisk announced today the results from two Ozempic(R) (once-weekly semaglutide 1.0 mg) head-to-head Phase 3 clinical trials, SUSTAIN 8 and SUSTAIN 10, which showed:

- Ozempic(R) was superior to treatment with the SGLT-2 inhibitor canagliflozin (300 mg) in reducing HbA1c and body weight in people with type 2 diabetes uncontrolled on metformin.[1] - Ozempic (R) was superior to Victoza� (liraglutide 1.2 mg) in reducing HbA1c and body weight in people with type 2 diabetes.[2]

These data were presented at the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) Annual Meeting in Barcelona, and simultaneously published in The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology (SUSTAIN 8) and Diabetes and Metabolism (SUSTAIN 10).[1],[2]

"We are proud of the superior clinical profile of once-weekly Ozempic(R), as demonstrated through all the SUSTAIN clinical trials, and encouraged by these new data which further reinforce the value of Ozempic(R) for people with type 2 diabetes," said Mads Krogsgaard Thomsen, executive vice president and chief science officer of Novo Nordisk.

These trials form part of the extensive SUSTAIN programme, a global clinical development programme that comprises more than 10 Phase 3 trials involving more than 10,065 adults with type 2 diabetes. To date, outcomes of SUSTAIN 1-7 and 9 have been published demonstrating Ozempic(R) is a best-in-class, efficacious and well-tolerated treatment option for people with type 2 diabetes.

SUSTAIN 8[1]

At 52 weeks, Ozempic(R) demonstrated a superior reduction in mean HbA1c of 1.5% compared to canagliflozin at 1.0%, from a baseline of 8.3%. In addition, 66.1% of people treated with Ozempic(R) achieved HbA1c treatment target

/Public Release. This material from the originating organization/author(s) might be of the point-in-time nature, and edited for clarity, style and length. Mirage.News does not take institutional positions or sides, and all views, positions, and conclusions expressed herein are solely those of the author(s).