Archaeological excavations generate a vast quantity of documents of various types and formats, which constitute a scientific heritage of great value. However, the way in which this data is organized, documented and preserved remains highly varied. This is the main conclusion of the article "Research data management practices and perspectives among Catalan archaeologists: a qualitative approach", published in the Journal of Documentation . The study, led by Sabina Batlle-Baró, a researcher at the Faculty of Information and Audiovisual Media at the University of Barcelona, provides the first qualitative analysis of research data management among those in charge of archaeological projects in Catalonia.
The aim of the study is not to assess the scientific value of the excavations, but to understand how teams manage the information they generate throughout the entire research process. To this end, the author has opted for a qualitative methodology based on in-depth, semi-structured interviews with 14 principal investigators of projects carried out at Catalan universities and research centres. This approach allows the study to go beyond a mere description of practices and to explore the researchers' motivations, difficulties and perceptions in the face of the new challenges posed by the digitization of archaeology.
The interviews show that digital transformation has dramatically increased the volume and complexity of the data generated during excavations. Photogrammetry, 3D scanners, geographic information systems, databases and digital tools still coexist with manual records that must subsequently be digitized. Faced with this reality, most teams have developed their own systems for organizing, storing and backing up data, tailored to the needs of each project. Although these solutions work satisfactorily on a day-to-day basis, they are often based on informal protocols, without shared standards, systematic documentation or data management plans.
The study highlights that this situation hinders the future reuse of data, particularly when the original researchers are no longer part of the teams or when information from different projects needs to be integrated. It also identifies limited awareness of good data management practices, a lack of specific training in this area, and the limited use of institutional repositories for the long-term preservation of information. By contrast, researchers place a high value on the support and training services offered by institutions that have staff specializing in research data management, which leads to a better understanding of the processes and more robust practices.
