Overview
- New AgriFutures Australia research finds poor and inconsistent connectivity across farms is limiting the adoption of digital technologies, reducing productivity and creating safety risks, with connectivity now a core input for modern agriculture
- The report shows emerging satellite and direct‑to‑handset technologies can help fill coverage gaps, but the most reliable solution is hybrid connectivity models supported by policy settings that recognise connectivity as essential agricultural infrastructure
Australian agriculture needs a more realistic, resilient and fit‑for‑purpose approach to connectivity if it is to remain productive, safe and competitive, according to new research released today by AgriFutures Australia.
The report, Next Generation Connectivity for Australian Agriculture: Assessing the Impact of LEOSat‑enabled Connectivity, found that persistent blackspots, patchy networks and limited whole-of-property coverage are constraining the uptake of digital farming technologies, and in some cases, putting workers at risk.
AgriFuture Australia Managing Director, Brianna Casey AM, said connectivity was a core production input for farm businesses.
"Connectivity isn't a nice-to-have, it's fundamental to how modern farms operate," Ms Casey said.
"From autonomous machinery and precision agriculture through to livestock monitoring, logistics and safety, farming depends on reliable, whole-of-property connectivity.
"This report puts evidence behind what farmers have been warning for years. Blackspots and patchy, inconsistent coverage aren't just frustrating: they're holding back productivity and creating safety risks."
The research combined technical analysis and consultation with farmers, researchers, telecommunications providers, equipment manufacturers and government.
It assessed the performance of emerging Low Earth Orbit satellite (LEOSat) and direct-to-handset technologies, finding they can improve coverage in remote areas but are not a standalone solution.
Instead, the report points to hybrid models, combining traditional mobile networks with satellite services, as the most reliable approach.
"LEOSat and direct-to-handset technologies have an important role to play, particularly in filling gaps and improving safety, but they're not the silver bullet," Ms Casey said.
"Farmers need integrated systems that work across entire properties, not just at the farmhouse or along the highway."
The research also highlights that barriers to adoption extend beyond availability, with digital capability gaps, uncertainty around integration, lifecycle costs and limited access to independent advice all slowing uptake.
Ms Casey said the findings also reinforce the need for policy settings that support hybrid connectivity models, improve spectrum access, encourage competition and recognise connectivity as enabling infrastructure.
"This is about more than coverage maps, it's about reliable, fit-for-purpose connectivity that supports a safe and productive agriculture sector," she said.
